For months, acquisition after acquisition, we’ve been reporting the feverish pace of Big Pharma investment in MPNs.
Even though their pursuit of the holy grail of JAK inhibitors may be designed to serve larger markets, for good and ill MPNs are the first target of opportunity.
Remember that tsunami of cash headed toward the shores of our MPN Village? We can only hope you made it to higher ground because here it is flooding our media as drug companies buy their way into MPN markets, new marketing campaigns buy up search engine space, new players arrive with new PR ploys, and new businesses belly up to the trough.
MPN and money are not strange bedfellows, Virtually all significant advances in MPN discovery and medical development have been funded by private labs or corporations, universities or National institutions.
There has always been a smell of money around research grants. In clinical trial, a corporation uses stockholder money to foot the bill for medical staff, patient recruitment, supplies, and electricity and often throws in major perks, honoraria, consulting positions, and assured fame and fortune for a select few.
It’s taken for granted a return on that investment is expected. It would be hard to establish true objectivity of clinical investigators, physicians and institutions despite any rote full disclosure statement that might be made.
When money is changing hands among drug companies, medical institutions and physicians, there’s enough transparency, professional oversight, experience and regulation to keep things within bounds. Usually.
But in the midst of this overheated marketing blitz, little of that applies to the new breed of for-profit commercial enterprises that has sprung up to serve the MPN market. Now there are openly commercial, profit-making corporations peddling MPN information and services to patients and physicians.
Some are good – even very good – and useful.
Either way, with the loss of transparency and oversight and the open introduction of profit motive, the information landscape for MPN patients, caregivers and healthcare providers has changed forever.
Content marketing is the common thread linking these new commercial MPN businesses along with much professional marketing. In content marketing, the material offered on the website or in printed literature is the draw. The sponsor and sales pitch is either invisible or barely visible. We’re familiar with this technique from ads, book offers and handouts.
The Incyte literature rack brochure, My Guide to Myelofibrosis is a good example. Solid information on identifying and coping with MF, how to read a CBC, good for a physician to offer his patient. A tip-in card offers free membership in My Life with MF, educational support. No mention of Incyte’s MF drug, Jakafi.
A familiar example of content marketing by non-profit sponsors is the series of YouTube videos offered by the Mayo Clinic featuring Dr. Ruben Mesa. Solid, required information delivered with impeccable professional reserve. They have been, rightly, the basic go-to text for MPN patients and probably some of our physicians. Produced by the Mayo Clinic.
The three new businesses we’re looking at all provide valuable content with significant production values…and all face similar challenges.
MPN University in its first appearance offers a short series of myelofibrosis Q&A video clips featuring Dr. Srdan Verstovsek and others… and a case study step-through approach for Continuing Medical Education credit. The target audience: physicians, oncologists, hematologists. The content, however, is readily accessible to patients as well. Not an advertisement in sight. No pop-ups, no banners. MPN University is part of oncuview.tv which has other target markets. The corporate sponsor is Incyte.
PatientPower follows international conventions and meetings of interest to MPN patients and produces video interviews with notable hematologists interviewed by owner, Andrew Schorr, himself an MF patient. PatientPower does display advertising, most of which is unrelated to MPNs, from its broader coverage of an array of cancers. And has corporate sponsorship.
MPN Advocacy & Education International positions itself as portal for education support and patient meetings. The well-designed attractive site offers news and links to resources for MPN patients with special emphasis on its own patient-physician meetings in various cities. No advertising on the site but there appear to be, for now at least, two revenue streams, a one day patient meeting with a $125 ticket price, and corporate sponsorship.
It’s that last item, corporate sponsorship, that sounds every alarm.
The minefield of perceived corporate influence over news coverage is one area that needs to be negotiated by all these sites.
These three businesses are evolving. PatientPower’s MPN coverage has been around for a year more or less; both MPN University and MPN A&E came on stream in the last month or two. They all take corporate sponsorship.
So when MPN University covers MF and has healthcare providers who deliver multiple short answers talking about a single product, ruxolitinib, we’re at the intersection of two worlds. MPN University is a profit-making business, part of another profit-making business. The spokespeople providing content – a wall of 50 talking head videos on the page – are not delivering commercials. These are professionals who established their credentials in the non-profit, medical services arena. Incyte is supporting the site with a grant.
In this case, the unrestricted educational grant Incyte made to MPN University was for the case study/CME portion for which registration is required. In those case studies. Dr. Verstosek delivers a comprehensive lecture, designed for physicians. His presentation is punctuated by a quiz and review in a stepped and thorough introduction to MPN diagnosis and therapy. It is an invaluable resource and Incyte is clearly listed as a sponsor.
That’s where site evolution comes in. The MPN University page, with its little 1 minute snippets from the Verstovsek lecture, with thumbnail videos of Verstovsek’s face, just feels inappropriate. Dr. Verstovsek as clinical investigator and physician rightly enjoys enormous prestige and affection in the MPN world. The edited format presents short answers to specific questions a doc might have. That’s a good thing. Unfortunately that wall of little videos with captions looks exactly like a series of small commercials for a sponsor’s product.
The real power and enduring value of MPN University may well be in the case study lectures and study segments. Hopefully, future presentations will provide a more appropriate path to get to them.
MPN Advocacy & Education’s website illustrates that minefield of perceived corporate influence. When Sanofi’s PR department issued a press release announcing good Phase 3 results of its JAK inhibitor and plans to file for regulatory approval, MPN A&E gave it front page headline treatment. This may be good news but it lacks context. MPN patients need to know that substantiating data has not been released, let alone reviewed, and likely won’t be until the ASH meeting in November. Sanofi is a corporate sponsor of MPN A&E.
MPN A&E was started by Ann Brazeau, who previously ran the successful MPN Research Foundation seminars. She left a few months ago when the Foundation decided to renew its focus on fund-raising and scientific research and dropped its patient seminar educational program.
Patient Power’s owner Andrew Schorr, a long-time working journalist, is keenly aware of the problem. He’s familiar with the issues surrounding editorial/advertising relationships. Patient Power gets partial unrestricted support from Incyte.
“(Incyte) purchased advertising exposure that helps sustain, on a non exclusive basis, our growing MPN channel,” said Schorr. “They have no control and I have no regular contact with them. Our producers have none. We are in a lot of dialogue with their potential competitors. The more the merrier to allow us to do more and not be perceived in any way to be beholden to any company, which we are not!”
MPN University’s initial focus on myelofibrosis somewhat limits a broad-based advertising option for right now…but that will soon change as new JAK inhibitors get ready to come on the market.
Philadelphia-area based Robert Bieber, a former CPA, built a career working with drug companies producing sales meetings and educational programs. Out of that came his North Star Creative, NSCI, a video and web production company, and a related medical education company. He’s the owner of OncuTV, a web based video magazine focused on oncology news and a very active advertising program. MPN University grew out of OncuTV earlier this year. From concept to launch took six months. MPN University was started with the help of an unrestricted grant from Incyte.
The MPN University idea is a good one: Reach out to local clinicians, “educate community based medical oncologists.” From a business, marketing, and production perspective, Bieber knows what he’s doing. As more MF therapeutic interventions become available and his editorial mix broadens, MPN University can be a powerful resource to reach an audience critical to early diagnosis and treatment.
Patient Power is most deeply embedded in the MPN community since owner, 52 year old Andrew Schorr is an MF patient of both Verstovsek and Dr. Francisco Cervantes in Barcelona, where Schorr is based. Experiencing Jakafi directly brings special insight into Schorr’s selection of experts. A medical journalist for the past quarter century, Schorr started Patient Power in 2005 and focused on MPNs when he himself was diagnosed with MF in 2011.
What do they bring to the table?
Both Patient Power and MPN University offer well produced direct testimony from the highest level MPN specialists in a lively, informative video magazine format. There are other sources for this material but these sites are well worth bookmarking and revisiting.
A small caveat: Although it looks like journalism, there’s not much hard questioning from the interviewer in Patient Power and none at all in MPN University so the viewer has an un-vetted look at an expert opinion. Since these expert opinions are by no means always universal an intervening gatekeeper would be valuable.
MPN A&E is evolving and considering Ann Brazeau’s obvious talents and the corporate support of three big pharmas the business should iron out any initial glitches in the road and find its way. However, despite marketing muscle, it’s not likely MPN A&E will become a credible news site without substantial changes.
The MPN A&E idea of local patient support meetings, clinical information outreach, is excellent and something we should support, profit or non-profit. Dr. Claire Harrison and MPD Voice have created the model with free or very low cost patient meeting. MPN Advocacy and Education’s $125 pricetag for the Atlanta meeting is a different story.
The rest of the stated MPN A&E mission – patient support and education – is unclear. There doesn’t seem to be any obvious reason why this business should be a primary resource for MPN patients or physicians at this time.
Patient support and education is currently being offered by dozens of non-profit MPN patient support groups, on-line e-mail based patient groups, bi-annual patient conventions and symposia, the MPN forum, CR&T, half a dozen Facebook pages, The MPD Support archives, MPD Voice, the Mayo Clinic website, YouTube’s massive MPN inventory,and MD Anderson’s website for starters. Clinical trial information and patient support group sites are mirrored in the MPN Research Foundation’s website pages and the public source for clinical trials, www.clinicaltrial.gov provides complete, verified listing of approved clinical trials.
But there is an exciting possibility as MPN A&E evolves and refines its focus. Both within and outside major metropolitan areas, there is a pressing need for MPN seminars for patients and physicians alike. Given the MPN A&E founder’s trackrecord, this is a need the new firm might help meet.
Take me back to the Contents
© MPNforum.com, 2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission is prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to MPNforum.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Comments on: "Money, Marketing & MPNs…" (3)
I learned a lot from Zhen’s careful and thorough and I think eminently fair exposition of the MPN information business. Bonnie is right, of course. There is ‘marketing’ in the names of stadiums, on NASCAR doors and hoods, and hospital ads, and it certainly exists on MPN ‘T’ shirts sold or given away at tournaments and symposia. ASFAIK the sponsors do not influence the outcomes. There does seem to be a sort of circuit of for profit MPN symposia that cater to civic pride. A pride that justifies charging $125 a day (or the diminishing acceptance of the sponsor’s benevolent waiver) to provide MPN info –Info that is readily available by the same experts for free elsewhere. The difference and the fair market value seems to me to lie in the personal appearance of well known and legitimate MPN experts. Not of their doing, but perhaps their institutions and sponsoring businesses might be a bit guilty -if there is any guilt. I mean that the sponsored experts seem to have become, to some degree at least in appearances, captured celebrities whom people will pay money to see in person -not as professionals presenting their research or clinical findings. I’m NOT implying that they are headliners –circuit riders who are paid to entertain their fans. I DO see why there is such a long wait to be seen in their offices by some of them. And I AM wondering if a MPN symposium ought to be presented in the same way and with the same ticket prices as any other civic entertainment. But then I come from an out-dated generation when for a doctor to have a name plate not made of dulled brass or corroded copper and the letters over one inch high was anathema and his name was in the paper only when he began and when he stopped his practice. :) Best, Arch
The MPN Symposium in Atlanta on 9/12 is being warmly received by our Atlanta MPN support group. Our major metropolitan area has never had a symposium with world renown experts. So many non profits groups and events have corporate sponsors. You see see corporate sponsors for charity events, sporting events, concerts, marathons, museums and so forth. Why does one have to look at it being sinister? It is an honor for us to have Dr Rueben Mesa speak to us. There will also be presentations by other MPN physicians as well as some focus for caregivers. In my opinion the registration fee of $125 is reasonable and for those who can not afford it, there are waivers. There is marketing everywhere we turn and sometimes it is good. The Atlanta Symposium is one of the good things.
To me this is proof that we are the tip of a huge iceberg. They know something that we don’t.